Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a sharp, actionable judgment criterion for identifying dead data, well-organized for a simple skill. Its main weakness is the absence of validation/verification steps for a destructive purge operation, which caps workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation step before deletion, e.g. re-confirm the memory has no real-world anchor and no behavioral impact with a second pass or a checklist, then delete.
Tighten the metaphorical passages ('缸中大脑', '承重墙') into concise direct guidance to improve token efficiency.
Provide a brief concrete procedure for executing the purge (locate, confirm, delete, log) so the destructive action is sequenced rather than implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with a clear decision test, but rhetorical flourishes ('缸中大脑的自言自语', '承重墙') pad the prose and could be trimmed; not a 4 because the metaphorical passages are non-essential. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, executable decision criterion ('如果答案是"不会"，那这就是死数据。杀掉它。') for an instruction-only judgment skill; minor gaps in how to actually execute the purge keep it from 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A destructive operation (deleting memories) with no validation/verification checkpoint or sequenced feedback loop, so per the destructive-cap guideline it cannot exceed 3; the single judgment criterion keeps it at rather than below 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no external references, organized into clear sections (intro + 判定标准 with two labeled criteria), meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |