Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, instruction-only audit skill with concrete numeric thresholds and a clear forbidden-pattern rule, organized into clean sections. Its main weaknesses are metaphorical verbosity that could be tightened and the absence of any sequenced validation loop across the audit checks.
Suggestions
Tighten the extended metaphors (e.g., "在门把手上涂毒药", "锋利如刺") into terse directives to reduce token overhead without losing the rules.
Add an ordered audit sequence with an explicit verification step (e.g., 'after placing each memory, re-read its disclosure and confirm it names a trigger scenario, not a feeling') so workflow_clarity can rise above 3.
Consider a compact summary table of the hard limits (priority=0 ≤5, priority=1 ≤15, 子节点≤10) so the actionable thresholds are scannable at a glance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but recurring metaphorical padding ("在门把手上涂毒药", "锋利如刺") and repeated rationale add more than minor over-explanation, fitting score 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, actionable rules (priority=0 ≤5条, priority=1 ≤15条, 子节点≤10, the banned "感到/意识到/发现自己在" disclosure pattern, two allowed trigger-signal types) with only minor abstraction gaps, matching score 4; code absence is not penalized per the instruction-skill note. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The audit checks (Parent URI, Disclosure, Alias, Trigger, Priority, 子节点数量, 巡检验证) are listed as parallel heuristics but lack an explicit sequence or any validation/verification checkpoint, fitting score 3; not capped by the destructive-operation rule since this is non-destructive. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the body is a single well-organized file with clear section headers, so the under-50-lines/no-external-references exception allows score 5 for well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |