Stripe payment platform integration. Manage payments, subscriptions, invoices, and customers via Stripe API.
57
Quality
52%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./public/skills/0xterrybit/stripe/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description has strong specificity and distinctiveness by clearly naming Stripe and listing concrete capabilities. However, it lacks explicit trigger guidance ('Use when...') which limits Claude's ability to know when to select this skill, and could benefit from additional natural trigger terms users commonly use when discussing payments.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause with trigger scenarios like 'Use when the user mentions Stripe, payment processing, billing integration, or needs to handle charges and refunds'
Include additional natural trigger terms users might say: 'billing', 'charges', 'refunds', 'checkout', 'payment gateway', 'recurring payments'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Manage payments, subscriptions, invoices, and customers' - these are distinct, actionable capabilities within the Stripe domain. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers 'what' (manage payments, subscriptions, invoices, customers via Stripe API) but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause or trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes good keywords like 'Stripe', 'payments', 'subscriptions', 'invoices', 'customers', and 'API', but missing common variations users might say like 'billing', 'charges', 'refunds', 'checkout', or 'payment processing'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clearly scoped to Stripe specifically with 'Stripe payment platform integration' and 'Stripe API' - unlikely to conflict with generic payment skills or other payment provider integrations. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
37%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill is admirably concise but sacrifices actionability - it reads more like a feature list than executable guidance. The single curl example is insufficient for the breadth of features advertised, and there are no workflows for complex operations like subscription lifecycle management or webhook verification.
Suggestions
Add executable code examples for each major feature (payment intents, subscriptions, invoices, refunds) - not just curl but complete request/response patterns
Include a workflow for subscription management with validation steps (e.g., check customer exists -> create subscription -> verify status -> handle failures)
Add webhook handling guidance with signature verification code and common event types to handle
Either expand inline with concrete examples or create separate reference files (SUBSCRIPTIONS.md, WEBHOOKS.md) for complex features
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, with no unnecessary explanations of what Stripe is or how payment APIs work. Every section serves a purpose and assumes Claude's competence. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides only one concrete curl example and lists features/usage as vague descriptions. Missing executable code for payment intents, subscriptions, invoices, refunds, and webhook handling - the core advertised features. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No workflows are defined for multi-step processes like subscription management or refund processing. No validation steps, error handling, or sequencing for operations that could fail or have side effects. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear sections, but for a skill covering this many features (payments, subscriptions, invoices, webhooks), it should either provide more inline detail or reference separate files for each domain. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
metadata_version | 'metadata.version' is missing | Warning |
metadata_field | 'metadata' should map string keys to string values | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
45f9fac
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.