Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction skill with concrete git commands, explicit validation, and strong safety guardrails. The single improvement opportunity is adding a worked commit-message example.
Suggestions
Add one or two worked commit-message examples (input change → full 'type(scope): subject' output) alongside the format template to make the actionability fully copy-paste ready.
Optionally show how to handle the 'validation fails because of the proposed change' branch with a concrete re-stage/re-commit command sequence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient — assumes Claude knows git, never explains concepts, and every line (workflow steps, format block, safety rules) earns its place with no padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable commands ('git status --short', 'git add <path>...', 'git commit -m', 'git log -1 --oneline') and a Conventional Commit type template, but offers only placeholder templates rather than a worked input→output example commit, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An 8-step sequenced workflow with an explicit validation checkpoint (step 6), a fix-before-commit feedback loop in the safety rules, a final staged-diff review (step 7), and a success confirmation (step 8). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, organized into clear Workflow and Safety rules sections; per the simple-skill guidance this is sufficient for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |