Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, actionable, and well-organized, with concrete tool names and a clear triage/safety workflow; the main gap is the absence of an explicit validation checkpoint for destructive comment operations.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step before destructive actions, e.g. "Before calling `delete-comment`, confirm the target comment ID and category with the user; if uncertain, escalate to human."
Document a feedback loop for failed operations (e.g. retry `set-comment-featured` and report the error if the call fails) to satisfy destructive/batch-operation expectations.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and token-efficient: a short purpose line, four numbered steps, and a closing scope note, with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete tools (`list-comments`, `reply-comment`, `set-comment-featured`, `delete-comment`, `set-comment-state`), enumerates five triage categories, and gives a concrete default-to-human rule for sensitive topics. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced with intent gating and a human-handoff safety rule, but destructive operations (delete, close comments) lack an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references, and the body is well-organized into a purpose line, numbered steps, and a scope note. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |