Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable reference with complete, executable dbt code across all model layers, but it is a monolithic document. It lacks an explicit build/validate workflow with error-recovery steps and keeps material in SKILL.md that would be better split into one-level-deep reference files.
Suggestions
Add an explicit workflow with validation checkpoints, e.g. 1) dbt run --select staging 2) dbt test --select staging 3) fix failing tests and re-run before building downstream layers.
Split bulk material into reference files (e.g. references/incremental-strategies.md, references/macros.md, references/testing.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with clearly signaled links.
Trim the dbt Commands section and obvious best practices (e.g. version control, don't test in prod) that restate knowledge Claude already has.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is code-forward and dbt-specific, but the "dbt Commands" section and best practices like "Version control - dbt project in Git" and "Don't test in prod" restate knowledge Claude already has. Mostly efficient with noticeable trimmable sections, matching anchor 3 rather than the minor-gaps anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides complete, copy-paste-ready artifacts: dbt_project.yml, source/staging/intermediate/mart SQL with configs, Jinja macros, test YAML, and CLI commands covering the common dbt workflow. This matches the fully-executable anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The layer progression (sources → staging → intermediate → marts → tests) implies a build order, but there is no explicit numbered workflow and no validate-fix-retry loop around `dbt build`/`dbt test`. Per the rubric's feedback-loop note, batch database operations without validation cap this at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly headed and ordered, but everything is inlined in a ~560-line SKILL.md with no references/ files; incremental strategies, macros, and testing patterns are bulk content that belongs in separate reference files. This matches anchor 3 (some structure, should-be-separate content inline), not the well-split anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |