Fetch CI build results and diagnose failures. Auto-detects provider from project files or URLs. Supports GitHub Actions, Buildkite, and CircleCI.
79
76%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
92%
1.67xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./tests/ext_conformance/artifacts/agents-mikeastock/skills/fetch-ci-build/SKILL.mdFetch CI build results, diagnose failures, extract actionable error information, and suggest fixes. Supports multiple CI providers with automatic detection.
| Provider | Detection | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub Actions | .github/workflows/ or github.com URL | gh CLI |
| Buildkite | .buildkite/ or buildkite.com URL | Python script |
| CircleCI | .circleci/ or circleci.com URL | Python script |
If the user provides a CI URL, detect provider:
github.com/.../actions/runs/... → GitHub Actionsbuildkite.com/... → Buildkiteapp.circleci.com/... or circleci.com/... → CircleCICheck for CI configuration directories:
# GitHub Actions
test -d .github/workflows && echo "github"
# Buildkite
test -d .buildkite && echo "buildkite"
# CircleCI
test -d .circleci && echo "circleci"digraph workflow {
rankdir=TB;
node [shape=box];
detect [label="1. Detect CI provider"];
load [label="2. Load provider reference"];
fetch [label="3. Fetch build results"];
check [label="4. Check for failures" shape=diamond];
passed [label="Report: Build passed!"];
read [label="5. Read failing source files"];
present [label="6. Present failures + proposed fixes"];
ask [label="7. Ask: Apply fix?" shape=diamond];
apply [label="Apply the fix"];
complex [label="Complex failure?" shape=diamond];
debug [label="Use systematic-debugging skill"];
next [label="Next failure?" shape=diamond];
done [label="Done"];
detect -> load;
load -> fetch;
fetch -> check;
check -> passed [label="passed"];
check -> read [label="failed"];
read -> present;
present -> ask;
ask -> apply [label="yes"];
ask -> complex [label="no"];
apply -> next;
complex -> debug [label="yes"];
complex -> next [label="no"];
debug -> next;
next -> read [label="yes"];
next -> done [label="no"];
}First, check if the user provided a URL. If not, detect from project files.
Read the appropriate reference file for provider-specific commands:
Use the provider-specific commands to fetch build information and failures.
Read the relevant source file to understand context:
Show the user:
Ask how to proceed:
If the failure requires deeper investigation (e.g., unclear root cause, flaky test, environmental issue), recommend the systematic-debugging skill.
| Type | Detection | Common Fixes |
|---|---|---|
| Test failure | Minitest/RSpec/Jest/pytest output | Fix assertion, update expected value, fix test setup |
| Lint error | Rubocop/ESLint/Biome violations | Auto-fix with linter's fix command |
| TypeScript | TSC compilation errors | Add types, fix type mismatches |
| Build error | Compilation failures | Fix syntax, missing dependencies |
| Mistake | Solution |
|---|---|
| Can't detect provider | Specify provider explicitly or provide CI URL |
| Missing credentials | Check provider reference for required env vars/auth |
| Build still running | Wait for completion or check partial results |
| Rate limiting | Wait and retry |
Dicklesworthstone/pi_agent_rust
8526f60
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.