helm-chart-scaffolding

Design, organize, and manage Helm charts for templating and packaging Kubernetes applications with reusable configurations. Use when creating Helm charts, packaging Kubernetes applications, or implementing templated deployments.

1.03x

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

97%

1.03x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

Securityby

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with complete, executable Helm examples and a well-sequenced workflow, but it is padded with conceptual explanation and inline duplication of material already available in bundle files. Tightening the overview sections and relying on the asset templates would improve token efficiency and disclosure.

Suggestions

Remove the "Helm Overview" and "Purpose" sections (concepts Claude already knows) and trim the "When to Use" list, which duplicates the frontmatter description's trigger clause.

Replace the full inline Chart.yaml and values.yaml blocks with brief excerpts plus pointers to assets/Chart.yaml.template and assets/values.yaml.template, since those templates already hold the complete content.

Add an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop to step 7 (e.g., "If helm lint or helm template fails, read the error, fix the template, and re-run until clean") rather than relying on a set -e script with no recovery guidance.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The "Helm Overview" and "Purpose" sections explain concepts Claude already knows (what Helm is), and full Chart.yaml/values.yaml blocks duplicate content already provided as asset templates; the bulk is useful but could be tightened, matching level 2 rather than the lean level-3 anchor.	2 / 3
Actionability	It provides fully executable commands (helm create, helm lint, helm template --dry-run) and complete copy-paste-ready templates (deployment.yaml, _helpers.tpl), matching the level-3 anchor; it is not level 2 because the code is real and complete rather than pseudocode.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clear 10-step sequence with a dedicated validation step exists, but there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop and the validation script only uses set -e with no error-recovery guidance, matching level 2 rather than the level-3 anchor that requires explicit feedback loops.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	References are clearly signaled (a "Reference Files" section plus inline "Reference: See..." callouts) and all four bundle files are real and one level deep, but the SKILL.md is a near-monolithic guide that duplicates full template content already in the asset files rather than offloading it, matching level 2's "content that should be separate is inline."	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it uses third-person imperative voice, names concrete capabilities, and pairs a clear what-statement with an explicit Use-when trigger clause. It is concise, distinctive, and free of fluff or over-claims.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	"Design, organize, and manage Helm charts for templating and packaging Kubernetes applications with reusable configurations" lists multiple concrete actions (design, organize, manage, template, package), matching the level-3 anchor; it is not the level-2 anchor because it goes well beyond naming a domain plus one action.	3 / 3
Completeness	It explicitly states both what ("Design, organize, and manage Helm charts...") and when ("Use when creating Helm charts, packaging Kubernetes applications, or implementing templated deployments"), matching the level-3 anchor with an explicit trigger clause; not level 2 because the when is explicit rather than implied.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	"Use when creating Helm charts, packaging Kubernetes applications, or implementing templated deployments" covers natural phrases a user would actually say; it is not level 2 because it includes several common variations rather than a single keyword.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Helm charts form a clear niche with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; not level 2 because the triggers are specific to Helm/Kubernetes packaging rather than broadly overlapping.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
skill_md_line_count	SKILL.md is long (567 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: Dicklesworthstone/pi_agent_rust
Commit: e9f9b67

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.