Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, highly actionable constraint catalog that assumes competence and avoids teaching known concepts. It scores top marks on conciseness, actionability, and progressive disclosure; the only middle score is workflow clarity, which is inapplicable to a non-sequential reference skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean MUST/SHOULD/NEVER bullets with no explaining of what Tailwind, Radix, or compositor props are; it assumes Claude's competence and every line earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Directives are concrete and copy-paste ready (e.g. "NEVER use `h-screen`, use `h-dvh`", "MUST use `text-balance` for headings", "MUST add an `aria-label` to icon-only buttons"); per the instruction-only note, the absence of code is not penalized because the guidance is actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a constraint catalog, not a sequenced multi-step workflow, so there are no steps or validation checkpoints; the content is well-organized but has no process sequence to evaluate, matching the middle anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a self-contained single file (~75 lines) with no bundle files and well-organized sections, with no nested or deep references; per the rubric, a skill with no need for external references scores 3 with well-organized sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |