CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ponytail

Forces the laziest solution that actually works, simplest, shortest, most minimal. Channels a senior dev who has seen everything: question whether the task needs to exist at all (YAGNI), reach for the standard library before custom code, native platform features before dependencies, one line before fifty. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra. Use on ANY coding task: writing, adding, refactoring, fixing, reviewing, or designing code, and choosing libraries or dependencies. Also use whenever the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "lazy mode", "simplest solution", "minimal solution", "yagni", "do less", or "shortest path", or complains about over-engineering, bloat, boilerplate, or unnecessary dependencies. Do NOT use for non-coding requests (general knowledge, prose, translation, summaries, recipes).

68

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A dense, opinionated, well-structured behavioral skill that delivers concrete actionable guidance via the ladder and worked examples while staying lean. The main weakness is triple repetition of the 'understand the problem first' safety point across sections.

Suggestions

Consolidate the 'understand the problem first' guidance into a single statement; it currently appears in The ladder, Rules, and When NOT to be lazy sections.

Consider extracting the intensity worked-example block or the ladder into a reference file so the SKILL.md body reads as a tighter overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and assumes Claude's competence (no 'what is a stdlib' padding); the persona aphorisms earn their place, though the 'understand the problem first' point is repeated three times (ladder, rules, 'When NOT to be lazy') and could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete actionable guidance throughout: a 7-rung ladder with real examples ('`<input type="date">` over a picker lib', 'CSS over JS'), a worked intensity example using `@lru_cache(maxsize=1000)`, and a concrete `# ponytail: ...` comment syntax — minor gaps only.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The ladder is a clear numbered sequence with 'stop at the first rung that holds' as a feedback loop and an explicit pre-step ('read the task and the code it touches first'), plus a validation rule ('leaves ONE runnable check behind'); minor error-recovery gaps keep it below 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections (Persistence, The ladder, Rules, Output, Intensity, When NOT to be lazy, Boundaries) with no bundle files and all content appropriately inline for a behavioral skill; slightly above 50 lines so not a clean 5.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

91%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-structured description that clearly states what the skill does and when to use it with comprehensive natural trigger phrases and an explicit negative scope. Minor overlap risk stems from the 'ANY coding task' breadth, slightly capping distinctiveness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('reach for the standard library before custom code', 'native platform features before dependencies', 'one line before fifty', 'writing, adding, refactoring, fixing, reviewing, or designing code') but much is behavioral framing ('Channels a senior dev') rather than concrete manipulations, leaving minor gaps in coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Forces the laziest solution that actually works, simplest, shortest, most minimal') and when ('Use on ANY coding task... Also use whenever the user says... Do NOT use for non-coding requests') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural trigger phrases including synonyms and a distinctive invocation: 'ponytail', 'be lazy', 'lazy mode', 'simplest solution', 'minimal solution', 'yagni', 'do less', 'shortest path', plus complaint triggers ('over-engineering', 'bloat', 'boilerplate', 'unnecessary dependencies').

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Distinctive triggers ('ponytail', 'lazy mode') and an explicit exclusion clause ('Do NOT use for non-coding requests') carve a niche, but 'Use on ANY coding task' is broad enough to risk overlap with general coding skills.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
DietrichGebert/ponytail
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.