Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, actionable multi-agent diagnosis workflow with strong validation checkpoints. Minor conciseness and progressive-disclosure gains are available by de-duplicating the read-only reminders and extracting the sub-agent role specs.
Suggestions
State the read-only / no-edits constraint once prominently instead of repeating it in each of the four sub-agent sections.
Extract the four sub-agent role checklists into a single one-level-deep reference file (e.g. references/investigator-roles.md) referenced from the main steps.
Add a minimal concrete scaffold (e.g. an example sub-agent prompt template or the exact output JSON shape) to lift actionability from strong to copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's intelligence, but the read-only/do-not-edit constraint and the "do not implement fixes" reminder are repeated across each sub-agent and section, which could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance: four named investigation roles with explicit check-lists, a required output shape, and recommended sub-agent roles (reviewer/explorer); minor gap is the absence of any concrete code or command scaffold. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with explicit checkpoints (underspecified-report inference, weak-evidence fallback, read-only enforcement) and feedback loops; the read-only nature means the destructive/batch cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with well-organized section headers and no nested references; the four detailed sub-agent role specs are candidates to split into a one-level-deep reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |