Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-organized skill body: it leads with operational prerequisites, provides an actionable intent-to-command table, and enforces a read-then-modify-then-confirm workflow for destructive write operations, deferring full command reference to a single one-level-deep file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the 意图表 is a dense phrase→command map and the banners carry operational (experimental/prerequisite/safety) signal rather than padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The intent table gives concrete, copy-paste-ready commands with required parameters and placeholders (e.g. "dws agoal strategy list --scope-type <DEPT|PERSONAL> --scope-id <ID>"), and full command detail is delegated to the real references/agoal.md. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Destructive overwrite write-ops are explicitly sequenced ("先 detail，基于完整数据修改后 update") with a validation checkpoint requiring a change summary and user confirmation before execution. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview pointing one level deep to a clearly signaled, verified reference (命令参考：[agoal.md](references/agoal.md)), with content appropriately split rather than inlined. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |