Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable overview: intent-to-command tables, concrete executable commands, an explicit query-constraint workflow, and well-signaled one-level-deep references to real bundle files. It scores at the top on all four dimensions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — intent tables and a hard-constraints list — with no concept explanations Claude already knows; the EXPERIMENTAL banner and deprecated-command note earn their place. Every token contributes, matching the level-3 anchor for lean, efficient content. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Commands are fully executable and copy-paste ready, e.g. "dws report inbox list --start <ISO> --end <ISO> --cursor 0 --size 20 --format json" and "dws report entry get --report-id <reportId>", matching the level-3 anchor for specific, executable examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The hard-constraints section sequences list → entry get / entry stats and enforces reusing the same reportId ("不要重新挑选、猜测或改用标题"), an explicit checkpoint; the intent table maps phrases to commands. Not a destructive/batch flow, so the validation cap does not apply, matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to real files ([report.md](references/report.md), [05-reporting.md](references/05-reporting.md), both present in ./references/) and a script, matching the level-3 anchor for clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |