Content
22%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is essentially a poorly organized table of contents with no substantive content in the body itself. It provides no actionable guidance on what the modes do, when to use them, or how they interact—all critical information is deferred to sub-files without any overview or summary. The flat listing conflates parent modes with their sub-components, creating a confusing hierarchy that undermines navigation.
Suggestions
Add a brief 1-2 sentence description for each mode directly in SKILL.md so Claude understands when to activate each mode without needing to read every sub-file.
Restructure the list to show clear hierarchy—nest sub-components (e.g., critical/improvements/good) under their parent mode (REVIEW) using indentation or sub-lists.
Add a usage workflow: how does Claude decide which mode to use? Include a decision guide or trigger conditions (e.g., 'Use BRAINSTORM when the user asks for ideas or exploration').
Remove the redundant 'Purpose' explanation and replace it with a concise mode-selection table or decision tree that provides immediate actionable value.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is relatively short, but the 'Purpose' section explains what modes are in a way Claude already understands. The main issue is the disorganized listing that adds cognitive overhead without adding value—sub-skills for REVIEW mode (critical/improvements/good) and TEACH mode (what-is-it/how-it-works/example/try-it-yourself) are listed as top-level items rather than nested under their parent modes. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill body contains zero actionable guidance—no instructions on how to activate modes, when to use them, what behaviors each mode entails, or any concrete examples. It is purely a list of links with no executable or instructional content whatsoever. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no workflow, sequencing, or process described. The skill doesn't explain how to switch between modes, when to use which mode, or how modes interact. The flat numbered list conflates parent modes with their sub-components, making the hierarchy confusing. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill does reference sub-skill files (one level deep), which is good progressive disclosure in principle. However, the organization is poor—sub-components of specific modes (e.g., critical/improvements/good under REVIEW) are listed at the same level as the modes themselves, making navigation confusing. The numbering is inconsistent (items 5-7 are REVIEW sub-items, 9-12 are TEACH sub-items, but this isn't visually clear). Without bundle files to verify, the references can't be fully validated. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |