Content
7%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is essentially a table of contents with no substantive content. It lacks any concrete, actionable guidance—no templates, no code, no specific frameworks, no examples of KPIs, dashboards, or analysis approaches. The instructions are generic platitudes that could apply to any domain, and the verbose 'Purpose' section wastes tokens explaining what a business analyst is rather than teaching Claude how to perform specific tasks.
Suggestions
Replace the generic 'Instructions' bullets with a concrete workflow, e.g., a step-by-step process for conducting a business analysis: define scope → gather data → analyze → build dashboard → present recommendations, with specific tools/commands at each step.
Add at least one concrete, executable example—such as a Python snippet for building a KPI dashboard, a SQL query template for cohort analysis, or a specific framework template (e.g., a balanced scorecard structure).
Remove the verbose 'Purpose' section entirely—Claude doesn't need to be told what a business analyst does. Use that space for actionable content like a decision tree for choosing the right analysis approach.
Add brief descriptions to each sub-skill reference explaining when to use it (e.g., 'Use for churn prediction and CLV modeling' next to Customer and Market Analytics) so Claude can navigate without opening every file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is padded with verbose, generic descriptions that Claude already knows (e.g., explaining what a business analyst does, listing vague capabilities). The 'Purpose' section restates the description in flowery language without adding actionable value. Much of the content is filler. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | There are no concrete code examples, specific commands, templates, or executable guidance. Instructions like 'Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs' and 'Apply relevant best practices' are entirely vague and abstract. Nothing is copy-paste ready or specific enough to act on. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no clear multi-step workflow, no sequencing of tasks, and no validation checkpoints. The four bullet points under 'Instructions' are generic platitudes rather than a defined process. There's no guidance on what to do when, or how to verify outcomes. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill does reference 10 sub-skill files and a resources/implementation-playbook.md, showing an attempt at progressive disclosure with one-level-deep references. However, no bundle files were provided to verify these exist, the main content is too thin to serve as a useful overview, and the references are just titles without descriptions of when to use each. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 5 / 12 Passed |