Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and well-sequenced with strong validation and error-recovery structure. Its weaknesses are conciseness (repeated protocol sections and verbose inline templates) and progressive disclosure (a long monolith that would benefit from splitting into reference files).
Suggestions
Move the large markdown templates (entity-inventory, ASSET-NNN spec, asset-manifest) and the detailed art-director/technical-artist briefs into reference files under references/ and link to them from SKILL.md.
Remove the redundant Collaborative Protocol and Recommended Next Steps sections whose rules are already embedded in the phase steps, or condense them to a brief checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body avoids explaining known concepts but is lengthy with repeated protocol restatements (Collaborative Protocol, Recommended Next Steps) and fully-written template blocks that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout — exact file paths, a runnable Grep pattern, specific agent briefs with numbered deliverables, and complete output templates. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Phase 0–6 sequence with explicit validation checkpoints ('Do NOT proceed to Phase 3 without user confirmation'), conflict-surfacing rules, and a numbered error-recovery feedback loop for blocked agents. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | All ~340 lines are inline in a single monolithic file with no bundle references; large templates and detailed agent briefs that could be split into separate reference files are kept inline despite the skill's length. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |