Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable triage workflow with clear sequencing and validation gates. Its main weaknesses are mild redundancy with the description and a large inline report template that leaves no room for progressive disclosure via references.
Suggestions
Move the Step 5 report template into a references file (e.g. references/triage-report-template.md) and link to it, reducing SKILL.md length and improving progressive_disclosure.
Trim or remove the 'When to run' section since the same trigger guidance already appears in the frontmatter description.
Consider collapsing the severity/priority tables into a single compact reference if the definitions are also available in .claude/docs/coding-standards.md, to reduce duplicated inline content.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and concrete, but the 'When to run' section duplicates the frontmatter description and the ~60-line report template is inline, so it could be tightened rather than earning the 'every token earns its place' top anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete globs, exact output paths, severity/priority tables, a full report template, and explicit verdicts — fully executable, copy-paste-ready guidance rather than vague direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Six numbered steps with sub-steps, an explicit stop-if-no-bugs validation checkpoint, a write gate requiring approval, and COMPLETE/BLOCKED verdicts give a clear sequence with explicit validation and feedback branches. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized, but there are no bundle files and no content split — the large inline report template is content that could live in a one-level reference, matching the 'could be better organized' anchor rather than the well-signaled-references anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |