Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally actionable, well-sequenced audit procedure with concrete tool invocations, explicit validation checkpoints, and fail-open handling for missing inputs. Its weaknesses are repetition of the NOT ASSESSED rationale across three sections and a monolithic single-file structure that could offload engine-specific scan patterns and the report template to reference files.
Suggestions
State the "NOT ASSESSED — NO DATA" policy once (e.g. in the Insufficient input section) and reference it from the Phase 5 verdict rules instead of re-explaining it in the opening blockquote; trim the rationale paragraphs about false clean passes to the operative rule.
Move the engine-specific scan globs (Unreal Content/ and Unity Assets/ variants) and the full report template into a references/ file (e.g. references/scan-patterns.md, references/report-template.md) and link to them from Phase 2 and Phase 4 to slim the main body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with operational detail and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the "NOT ASSESSED — NO DATA" policy is explained three times (opening blockquote, the "Insufficient input" section with multi-paragraph rationale about false clean passes and absence of evidence, and the Phase 5 verdict rules), so it could be tightened — matching 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: copy-paste-ready Grep patterns (e.g. pattern="^## Summary" glob="design/gdd/*.md"), exact glob lists per content type and per engine (Content/**/*.umap, Assets/**/*Item*.asset), explicit status thresholds (IN PROGRESS = 50–99%), a complete report template, and exact user-facing questions — matching 'fully executable; copy-paste ready… specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-phase sequence with an explicit pre-flight validation checklist (record FOUND/ABSENT per input, stop when required inputs are missing), fail-open rules for missing `## Summary` sections, code-root-unresolved handling, and explicit verdict selection rules — matching 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops…; checklists for complex processes'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files ship with the skill; the single body is well-sectioned (Phases 1–5, headed subsections) and every external reference is a clearly signaled, one-level-deep project path (`.claude/docs/workflow-modes.md`, `.claude/docs/code-root-resolution.md`, sibling skills). Minor gaps keep it below 5: ~310 lines monolithic with policy text repeated across sections, and chunks (engine-specific glob tables, the report template) are natural candidates for separate reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |