Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable orchestration pipeline with clear sequencing, validation gates, and error-recovery feedback loops; its main weakness is redundant duplication of the role descriptions across two sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and free of concept-explanation filler, but the six role descriptions are duplicated nearly verbatim across 'Team Composition' (lines 33-38) and 'How to Delegate' (lines 43-48), so it 'includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance: named subagent_types, per-phase deliverables, numeric constraints ('all lines under 120 characters', 'German/Finnish typically +30%'), and explicit AskUserQuestion options, fully matching the 'fully executable / copy-paste ready' anchor for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced Phase 0-5 pipeline with explicit validation checkpoints (Decision-Point approval gates, Phase 4 consistency review, Phase 5 polish) and a feedback-loop Error Recovery Protocol, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the body is organized into well-signaled sections (phases, team, delegation, error recovery, output) with no nested references, satisfying the 'well-organized sections' criterion for a self-contained orchestration skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |