Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-structured instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit failure-handling feedback loop. Its only gap is that a couple of evidence steps (finding the owning test, invoking Playwright) are described at the decision level rather than given as copy-paste commands.
Suggestions
For actionability, add the specific command or file-discovery step for the owning unit/integration test and the focused Playwright invocation so each evidence path is copy-paste ready.
Consider a one-line example of the report format to make the "Report" section fully executable rather than a bullet list of fields.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with zero padding: it never explains concepts Claude already knows, and every line is actionable guidance, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands (npm run type-check, npm run check:agent-contracts) and explicit decision heuristics, but locating the owning test file and the exact Playwright invocation are left implicit, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-phase sequence (Inspect, Select evidence, Handle results, Report) with an explicit feedback loop: on failure, diagnose before widening scope and do not skip or weaken assertions. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview (~38 lines) with well-signaled one-level-deep references (Testing strategy doc, nearest AGENTS.md) and no nested or buried references, delegating detail appropriately. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |