CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

openspec-continue-change

Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.

68

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

The canonical home for this skill is openspec-continue-change in Draculabo/AntigravityManager

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable CLI-workflow skill with concrete commands, explicit branch handling, and useful guardrails. Minor improvements available: deduplicate the context/rules constraint reminder and add an explicit post-write validation/retry loop.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient imperative guidance with concrete commands and no filler explanations of concepts Claude already knows. The constraint that `context` and `rules` must not be copied into the artifact is repeated three times (in the steps, guidelines, and guardrails), which could be trimmed to one authoritative statement.

4 / 5

Actionability

Commands are copy-paste ready (`openspec list --json`, `openspec status --change "<name>" --json`, `openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json`) with the returned JSON fields explained, and all status branches (complete, ready, blocked) plus the no-name case are covered with concrete handling. Common cases are well covered.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered sequence with explicit status-based branching, an error path for the all-blocked case, and a "verify the artifact file exists after writing" guardrail. It lacks an explicit validate-then-retry feedback loop after writing an artifact, keeping it below the top anchor.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, and all content lives inline in a single well-sectioned file (Input, Steps, Output, Artifact Creation Guidelines, Guardrails) at a length appropriate to a single CLI workflow. Organization is good, though the schema-specific artifact patterns could arguably live in a reference file if the skill grows.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with an explicit "Use when..." clause covering concrete trigger phrases and a well-delineated niche. Its only weakness is thin capability coverage — a single action is named rather than the range of artifacts it can produce.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact" names the domain and one concrete action, but does not enumerate multiple specific capabilities. It sits at the '1-2 concrete actions' level rather than the 'several specific actions' level.

3 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both: what ("creating the next artifact" for an OpenSpec change) and when ("Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow") with concrete trigger phrases. Both are clearly and explicitly stated.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"progress their change", "create the next artifact", and "continue their workflow" are natural phrases a user would say when needing this skill. Coverage is good but offers few synonyms or variations beyond these, falling just short of comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"OpenSpec change" carves out a clear niche, and the "continue/progress" framing gives it distinct triggers with minimal conflict risk against sibling openspec skills (e.g., creating or archiving changes).

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
Draculabo/AntigravityManager
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.