Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, concrete, and highly actionable with specific formulas, thresholds, and a copy-paste JSON schema, organized into clean sections; the main gap is the absence of explicit validation checkpoints in the decision workflow.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation steps in the workflow — e.g., 'Verify total exposure ≤ 80% and single position ≤ 25% before finalizing allocations' — with a fix-and-recheck loop.
Include a brief final-output validation step confirming the JSON output respects all exposure/correlation/cash-reserve constraints before delivery.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and bullet-driven with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows; every section (sizing formulas, exposure limits, action criteria, JSON schema) earns its place, matching the score-3 anchor of efficient, competence-assuming content. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete executable guidance is provided throughout — sizing formulas, numeric confidence/risk modifiers, exposure thresholds (80%/25%/40%/20%), explicit Buy/Sell/Hold criteria, and a copy-paste JSON output schema — matching the score-3 anchor for fully actionable, ready-to-use instructions. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered sections (size → risk-manage → decide → execute → structure) give a present sequence, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops for these consequential allocation decisions, so per the guideline workflow clarity caps at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a self-contained single-file skill with no nested/deep references and clear section organization (Overview, Instructions, Output Format, Best Practices, Mistakes); the content is cohesive core guidance rather than material that should be split out, fitting the well-organized score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |