Content
47%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clearly structured, readable reference for market-signal analysis, but it leans on definitions of well-known concepts, lacks executable data/indicator steps, and presents analysis dimensions rather than a validated workflow.
Suggestions
Replace definitional bullets (uptrend, support, resistance) with the specific checks or computations Claude should perform.
Add a sequenced workflow with an explicit validation step before outputting a signal (e.g. require multi-timeframe + volume confirmation, then re-check conflicts).
Specify how strength and confidence (e.g. 0.8, 0.75) are derived so the output is reproducible rather than guessed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient bullet-form structure, but several tokens are spent defining concepts Claude already knows ('Uptrend: Series of higher highs and higher lows', 'Support: Previous lows where buying emerged') that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete JSON output format and some decision rules ('Positive news + bullish technicals = Strong buy signal'), but gives no data-sourcing steps, indicator computation, or methodology for the strength/confidence scores, leaving key details missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered sections (1-5) read as analysis dimensions rather than a sequenced procedure, and there is no validation/verification checkpoint before emitting a trading signal. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single, well-organized SKILL.md with clear headers (Overview, Instructions, Output Format, Best Practices) and no nested references; at ~108 lines it is slightly over the simple-skill threshold, so a split could help but structure is already good. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |