Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, well-structured body: executable DQL queries, a dense remediation table, and exemplary progressive disclosure that keeps a 42KB error-code catalog out of context while making it precisely searchable. The main weaknesses are minor: slight redundancy in the Overview/'When to use' sections and a fragmented, inconsistently numbered workflow presentation.
Suggestions
Trim the generic opening sentence ("Dynatrace extensions allow you to extend the functionality of Dynatrace by integrating with external systems and custom data sources.") and the 'When to use this skill' bullet list, which duplicates the frontmatter description, to tighten conciseness.
Consolidate the status-check → event-log → error-code-lookup flow into a single explicitly numbered workflow (and fix the orphaned "### 2." heading, which has no "### 1.").
Add an explicit checkpoint step in the workflow, e.g. 'verify the monitoring configuration is enabled' before diagnosing, so the decision points are stated once in one place rather than implied across sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean — two tight DQL queries, a dense status table, and pointed search instructions — but a few tokens could be trimmed: "Dynatrace extensions allow you to extend the functionality of Dynatrace by integrating with external systems and custom data sources" is generic filler, and the "When to use this skill" bullets duplicate the frontmatter description. Not 5 because not every token earns its place; not 3 because the padding is minor and there is no explanation of concepts Claude already knows beyond the opening sentence. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Both DQL queries ("timeseries count(dt.sfm.extension.config.status), by: {...}" and "fetch dt.system.events | filter ...") are copy-paste ready with clearly-marked placeholders, the error-code regex "DEC:[A-Z0-9_]+" is concrete, and the reference-file lookup instructions ("Search for the specific error code heading (e.g. `## Error Code DEC:1D6`) ... read the next ~50 lines. Stop at the next `## Error Code` header") are exactly executable. Common cases (non-OK status, restarts, no data) are each covered with specific steps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear decision sequence is present — run the status query, "If a status is not `OK`, get detailed logs", extract the DEC code, then search the reference — and the Troubleshooting section enumerates issue-specific remediations. Not 5 because the sequence is distributed across sections rather than given as one ordered workflow, the heading "### 2. Retrieve Extension Event Logs" is numbered with no corresponding "### 1.", and checkpoints are implicit (e.g., no explicit 'verify the config is enabled' gate before fetching logs); not 3 because the ordering and decision points are unambiguous and the read-only nature of the operations means no destructive-operation validation cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The 133-entry error-code catalog is appropriately split into references/extensions-error-codes.md (verified to exist and match the documented "## Error Code DEC:<code>" structure), referenced one level deep, clearly signaled, and accompanied by explicit load-avoidance guidance ("**Do not load the full file.**"). The inline status table is compact, frequently-needed content that belongs in the body, matching the clear-overview anchor exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |