Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient overview with excellent progressive disclosure: a lean body, real one-level-deep references mapped to workflows, and a concrete drill-down pattern. The main improvement would be an executable starter DQL query and an explicit zero-results/permissions checkpoint wired into the drill-down flow.
Suggestions
Include one complete starter query in the body, e.g. `timeseries avg:dt.frontend.web.page.largest_contentful_paint, by: {frontend.name} | filter dt.rum.user_type == "real_user"`, so users get copy-paste-ready DQL without opening a reference.
Add an explicit validation step to the Drill-Down Pattern: "If a query returns zero rows, check sensitive-field permissions and see [references/troubleshooting.md](references/troubleshooting.md)" — the Field Permissions section notes filters on hidden fields silently return no results, but the workflow never loops back to it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense: compact tables for data sources, filters, and narrowing dimensions; a one-line "Rule of thumb"; thresholds as a terse quick-reference. It explains nothing Claude already knows and every token carries Dynatrace-specific information (field names, the permissions policy, metric names), matching the 5 anchor (lean and efficient; every token earns its place) rather than the 4 anchor, which reserves room for trimmable over-explanation — none is evident. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout: exact filter fields ("frontend.name", "characteristics.has_page_summary"), a copy-paste-ready policy statement, named metrics, and numeric thresholds. It falls short of the 5 anchor because the body contains no executable DQL example query — for a query-centric skill, a starter `timeseries`/`fetch` snippet would make the guidance fully copy-paste ready, leaving it at the 4 anchor (concrete with minor gaps) rather than below it, since the concrete field/policy specifics are unambiguous. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Drill-Down Pattern gives a clearly sequenced layered approach ("1. Identify the frontend" → "2. Find the affected page or view" → narrowing-dimension table), plus a source-selection rule of thumb and a workflow-to-reference map. It sits at the 4 anchor (clear sequence, minor gaps) rather than 5 because there are no explicit validation/error-recovery checkpoints in the main flow — e.g., "if zero results, check field permissions / see troubleshooting.md" is only implicit via the workflow table. The destructive/batch cap does not apply since these are read-only queries. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Verified against the actual bundle: all 12 reference files referenced in the body (characteristics.md, web-vitals.md, user-sessions.md, user-actions.md, error-tracking.md, frontend-backend-linking.md, csp-violations.md, mobile-monitoring.md, web-performance-analysis.md, visibility-changes.md, slow-page-load-playbook.md, troubleshooting.md) exist in ./references/, one level deep, each mapped to a named workflow in a table with explicit on-demand loading guidance ("Load the reference when you start the workflow, not upfront"). The body is a concise overview with the bulk appropriately split — a clear match to the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |