Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-sequenced preparation skill with concrete commands and clear file targets. The main weakness is the absence of any validation checkpoint confirming the relevant specs were actually located and read before proceeding.
Suggestions
Add a verification checkpoint after step 5 (e.g., confirm the Pre-Development Checklist items were all read before proceeding) to strengthen workflow clarity.
Trim the redundant framing — the intro line and the closing "This step is mandatory" sentence overlap; keep one to push conciseness toward anchor 5.
Give step 3 a concrete helper (e.g., a flag on get_context.py that lists applicable specs) so it is executable rather than a judgment step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with executable commands and no concept over-explanation, but the intro "Read the relevant development guidelines before starting your task", the closing "This step is mandatory before writing any code", and step 7 are mildly redundant, fitting anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable commands ("python3 ./.trellis/scripts/get_context.py --mode packages", "cat .trellis/spec/<package>/<layer>/index.md") and concrete file names, but steps 3 and 7 are judgment steps and the <package>/<layer> placeholders require substitution, placing it at anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step numbered sequence with concrete per-step actions, but no explicit validation checkpoints; since the task is read-only preparation rather than destructive/batch work, this is a minor gap at anchor 4 rather than the cap-at-3 case. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is under 50 lines with well-organized numbered sections; per the simple-skills note this scores 5 without external file references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |