Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-sequenced, actionable workflow with strong validation and error handling. Its weakest point is progressive disclosure: it references bundled Python scripts that are not actually present in the skill bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced parse-knowledge-base.py and merge-knowledge-graph.py in a scripts/ directory so the invoked commands resolve.
Provide the article-analyzer subagent prompt template verbatim (or in a referenced file) so the ANALYZE phase is fully reproducible.
Tighten the 'What It Detects' section to bullet signals only, moving the pattern definition to a reference file if more detail is needed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and task-focused with tight phase descriptions and code blocks; the 'What It Detects' and 'Notes' sections add minor explanatory padding that could be trimmed but is largely justified for a niche pattern. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable commands (python3 parse/merge scripts, guarded bash cleanup) and specific batching parameters, but the article-analyzer subagent prompt is described rather than given verbatim, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five phases are clearly sequenced with explicit validation (Phase 5 step 2 checks node/edge integrity), error-recovery feedback (Phase 1 script-error handling, Phase 3 batch-failure continuation), and a guarded destructive cleanup, matching the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation and feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file is well-structured with clear sections and one-level-deep script references, but the referenced bundle scripts (parse-knowledge-base.py, merge-knowledge-graph.py) are not present in the bundle, leaving those references unresolvable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |