CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

app-store-review

Full-lifecycle Apple App Store review for iOS and iPadOS apps. Use for pre-submission audits, rejection diagnosis and Resolution Center replies, Guideline 4.3 spam or similarity recovery, human-craft and low-effort audits, Apple design and Human Interface Guidelines audits of native interaction, motion, gestures, materials, haptics, accessibility, and iPad adaptation, App Review Notes, privacy manifests, Info.plist permission strings, subscriptions, Sign in with Apple, account deletion, UGC, third-party AI consent, TestFlight or App Store readiness, and vague requests such as "review my app" or "will Apple approve this" when an Xcode, Expo, React Native, or Flutter project is present. Produces evidence-tagged Markdown, JSON, and a self-contained visual HTML report, runs a read-only deterministic scan first, and only offers grouped fixes after the report.

77

Quality

97%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable multi-mode workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure. The only weakness is mild redundancy between the output-gate summary and the per-mode sections.

Suggestions

Consolidate the 'Output gates' section so each literal gate is stated once, cross-referencing the per-mode sections instead of restating them, to reduce redundancy.

Consider moving the long enumeration of audit sub-areas (motion, gestures, materials, haptics, accessibility, iPad adaptation) into references/human-craft-audit.md or apple-design-review.md and summarizing the dimensions in SKILL.md.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence without padding basic concepts, but the 'Output gates' section restates requirements also given in the per-mode sections, a minor redundancy that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready commands (app_store_review_scan.py with documented flags, render_app_store_report.py) plus exact contract text blocks, concrete verdict/severity/evidence-confidence labels, and a literal verification handoff block.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear Discover → Establish scope → Mode A/B/C → Current-policy check sequence with explicit validation checkpoints: read-only first pass, an 'Output gates' checklist, wait-for-approval before editing, and a verification block covering desktop/mobile widths.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a well-signaled overview pointing one level deep to real bundle files (references/*.md, scripts/*.py) via 'Read and follow … completely', with content appropriately split and easy to navigate.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is comprehensive, concrete, and trigger-rich, explicitly covering both capabilities and use conditions in third person. It is among the strongest examples for a complex domain skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions across the full lifecycle—pre-submission audits, rejection diagnosis, Resolution Center replies, Guideline 4.3 recovery, HIG audits of motion/gestures/materials/haptics/accessibility—and outputs (evidence-tagged Markdown, JSON, visual HTML, read-only scan, grouped fixes), giving comprehensive coverage.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (full-lifecycle Apple App Store review producing Markdown/JSON/HTML via a read-only scan) and 'when' (Use for … with concrete triggers and the project-present condition for vague requests).

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrases ('review my app', 'will Apple approve this') alongside comprehensive domain terms and synonyms—Guideline 4.3, TestFlight, Sign in with Apple, App Review Notes, Info.plist, and framework names (Xcode, Expo, React Native, Flutter).

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear Apple App Store review niche with highly distinct triggers (Resolution Center, Guideline 4.3, Sign in with Apple, App Store readiness), making conflict with unrelated skills minimal.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
ElxMaj/app-store-review-skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.