The ~40-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it jumps straight to concrete Korean prompt patterns, a label table, a rewrite mapping, and an output contract with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows.

Delivers copy-paste-ready Korean prompt templates with explicit Camera/Lighting/Sound direction and a protected-name → original-descriptor rewrite table ('유명 캐릭터 그대로' becomes '오리지널 마스크를 쓴 옥상 배달원'), giving fully executable guidance for an instruction-only skill.

As a simple single-purpose skill (produce a labeled Korean example), the flow is unambiguous — pick a Safe Example Pattern, apply the label, rewrite if a protected identity appears, and return per the Output Contract; per the simple-skills note this qualifies for the top score.

With no external references needed, the body is organized into clearly labeled sections (Intent, Example Labels, Safe Example Patterns, Rewrite Pattern, Output Contract), satisfying the under-50-lines allowance for well-organized single-file skills.

Lists multiple concrete capabilities — 'Korean Seedance 2.0 examples, Korean prompt patterns, example rewrites, or safe versions of working Korean video-generation prompts' — matching the anchor for listing multiple specific concrete actions.

Explicitly states both what the skill does (examples/patterns/rewrites/safe versions) and when to use it ('This skill should be used when the user asks for...'), with an explicit trigger clause.

Natural phrases a user would actually say ('Korean Seedance 2.0 examples', 'Korean prompt patterns', 'example rewrites', 'safe versions of working Korean video-generation prompts') give good coverage of the request surface.

A tightly scoped Korean-language Seedance 2.0 example niche with distinct triggers, unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; uses third person ('the user asks') so no voice penalty applies.