Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable audit catalog: each smell has an executable detection recipe, triage thresholds, and false-positive guards, capped by a clear sequenced workflow. It assumes Claude's intelligence and avoids both verbosity and concept re-explanation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense signal throughout — pattern, executable grep, 'why it matters', triage, and false positives per category — and assumes Claude's competence without explaining TypeScript, yargs, or grep. Not a level-2 case: there is no padded conceptual explanation, only earned, codebase-specific detail. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Every category ships a copy-paste-ready grep/rg recipe plus concrete triage thresholds ('Five flags or three commands sharing the same accessor pattern', '5+ is a smell'), fully executable rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A dedicated 'Workflow' section sequences the pass (run greps -> triage each hit as justified/refactor/false-positive -> group findings -> document in one PR), with an explicit classification checkpoint; the read-only audit nature means the destructive-operation validation cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and all content is inline with well-organized numbered sections and clearly signaled cross-skill pointers (post-implementation-review, refactoring, define-errors) rather than nested file references; per the rubric's simple-skill note, well-organized sections without external references score 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |