Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable instruction-only skill with a clear workflow, checklists, and a concrete output template. The only slight gap is progressive disclosure, since all content lives in one file with no reference bundle to split into.
Suggestions
If the four-test checklists or controversy protocol grow, move them into a reference file (e.g. references/tests.md) and link from SKILL.md to demonstrate one-level-deep progressive disclosure.
Add one or two short worked examples (a passing claim and a failing one) under the Judgment section to make the outcomes even more concrete without much length.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: no padding, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every section earns its place while assuming Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance for an instruction-only skill: per-test checklists, a five-bullet controversy protocol, four defined judgment outcomes, and a copy-paste-ready seven-step output template. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (Read the Whole Piece → Four Tests → Controversy → Judgment → Review Output) with explicit checklists and a feedback checkpoint ("wait for the writer to adopt it before editing authored prose"); not a destructive/batch operation so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with easy navigation, but the body is a self-contained ~100-line single file with no external references, slightly exceeding the 50-line simple-skill exception, so it shows good structure rather than the full multi-file progressive-disclosure pattern. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |