CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

competitor-tracking

When the user wants to monitor competitor apps on an ongoing basis — tracking metadata changes, keyword shifts, screenshot updates, rating trends, or new features. Use when the user mentions "competitor monitoring", "track competitors", "competitor alert", "competitor changed their title", "watch a competitor app", "competitor weekly report", "competitive intelligence", or "what changed in competitor's listing". For a one-time deep competitive analysis, see competitor-analysis. For market-wide chart movements, see market-movers.

74

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

High

Do not use without reviewing

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable monitoring skill with concrete API calls, a ready report template, and a clear weekly/monthly cadence. Slight room to tighten the inline template and add explicit API-failure handling.

Suggestions

Add a brief verification step before filling the weekly report (e.g., confirm each Appeeky API call returned data and retry on failure) to strengthen workflow_clarity toward a 5.

Consider moving the full weekly report template into a references/ file and linking to it, keeping SKILL.md as a tighter overview.

Trim the response playbook table entries slightly so each row states only the change and the action without restating context Claude can infer.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Largely lean and purposeful with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; the weekly report template and response playbook are long but earn their place as concrete deliverables, with only minor trimming possible.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable guidance throughout: concrete Appeeky API calls, a copy-paste bash script with curl+jq, named MCP tools (get_app, get_app_keywords, get_app_reviews), and a ready-to-fill report template.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear weekly cadence (setup → track → report) with monthly deep-dive triggers acting as escalation checkpoints; not a 5 because there are no explicit error-handling/verification steps for API failures before filling the template.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Single well-organized SKILL.md with clear section headers and a Related Skills cross-reference block; no bundle files exist so structure is judged on organization, which is good with only minor inline length in the template.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: third-person voice, concrete actions, comprehensive natural triggers, and explicit boundary guidance against sibling skills. No vague fluff or over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "tracking metadata changes, keyword shifts, screenshot updates, rating trends, or new features" — giving comprehensive coverage of what the skill monitors.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (ongoing competitor surveillance tracking metadata/keyword/rating/feature deltas) and when (a clear "Use when the user mentions..." clause with concrete trigger phrases).

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Provides a broad set of natural phrases users would actually say ("competitor monitoring", "track competitors", "competitor alert", "competitor weekly report", "what changed in competitor's listing") plus synonyms.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Carves a clear niche (recurring tracking vs. one-time analysis vs. market-wide charts) and explicitly redirects to competitor-analysis and market-movers, minimizing wrong-skill triggering.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
Eronred/aso-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.