Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, highly actionable advisory skill that earns its tokens with operational specifics. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: a dangling revenuecat.md reference and all detail inlined rather than split into bundle files.
Suggestions
Add the missing revenuecat.md bundle file (under references/) or remove the dangling "See `revenuecat.md` integration guide" reference so navigation is not broken.
Split the larger reference material (e.g., the Key Metrics table and dunning/win-back schedules) into one-level-deep reference files linked from the overview to improve progressive disclosure.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the output workflow (e.g., confirm a metric against its benchmark before promoting it to a Top Issue / Priority action).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, table- and schedule-driven content that adds domain-specific operational knowledge (benchmarks, dunning day-by-day schedule, win-back ladder) Claude would not reliably know; no padding or explanation of basic concepts. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready operational guidance: day-by-day trial nurture copy, a numbered cancellation flow, a day-by-day dunning table, a win-back offer ladder with specific discount percentages, and exit-survey options. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Stages 1–4 are clearly sequenced and sub-flows (cancellation, dunning, win-back ladder) are ordered, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints before recommending fixes; minor gaps keep it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and a Related Skills block, but everything is inlined in one ~200-line file with no bundle files; the inline "See `revenuecat.md` integration guide" references a file that is not present in the bundle. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |