Content
80%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, actionable strategy skill with excellent conciseness and concrete specifics, but its multi-stage workflow lacks explicit validation/feedback checkpoints and it references a non-existent revenuecat.md bundle file. Strong on operational detail, weaker on workflow gates and progressive-disclosure file structure.
Suggestions
Add explicit verification checkpoints to the workflows — e.g., after implementing a dunning or win-back change, re-measure the relevant metric against the benchmark and iterate if it falls short — to lift workflow_clarity to 3.
Resolve the dangling `revenuecat.md` reference: either create a references/revenuecat.md bundle file with the integration details, or remove the inline reference and fold the essential RevenueCat settings into the body.
Consider splitting the detailed day-by-day dunning schedule and trial nurture sequence into a one-level-deep reference file so the SKILL.md overview stays leaner and progressive disclosure reaches the clear-overview anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and operational — dense tables of benchmarks, day-by-day nurture/dunning sequences, and platform-specific values ("iOS: 6 days… up to 16", "Android: 3 days") with no padding explaining concepts Claude already knows. It is not level 2 because nearly every line is domain-specific actionable detail rather than general explanation that could be tightened. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Highly concrete guidance: per-app-type trial lengths, specific discount percentages and timing in the win-back ladder, exact engagement thresholds ("Sessions < 1 per week", "14+ days"), and named APIs (`ManagedSubscriptionGroup`, StoreKit 2, RevenueCat). Per the scoring note, absence of runnable code in this instruction-only skill is not penalized because the guidance is specific and copy-paste ready as instructions. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The lifecycle is clearly sequenced into Stages 1–4 with ordered sub-flows (dunning day schedule, cancellation steps, win-back escalation), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or validate→fix→retry feedback loops. It is not level 3 because anchor-3 requires explicit validation steps and error-recovery loops, and not level 1 because the sequence is unambiguous and well-structured. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with a clear Related Skills block, but the body references "`revenuecat.md` integration guide" while no such bundle file exists in references/scripts/assets, so that reference is dangling. It is not level 3 because a referenced detailed file is missing and ~200 lines of inline content is not split into one-level-deep bundle files; not level 1 because organization and cross-skill navigation are present and references are only one level deep. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |