Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean, executable workflow: concrete commands, a clear sequence, an explicit validation gate, and well-organized sections with no padding. The only refinement worth making is a brief error-recovery note for failing checks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is 44 lean lines: every instruction is project-specific (base branch, `make ci`, `gh pr create --base main --fill-first`, template sections) with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. This matches the 5 anchor 'Lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The guidance is fully executable with copy-paste-ready commands (`make ci`, `git push -u origin HEAD`, `gh pr create --base main --fill-first`) plus a concrete enumeration of the template sections to complete. It covers the common case end-to-end, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four steps are clearly sequenced with an explicit validation gate ("Do not open a PR with failing lint/tests") and honesty requirements for the Verification section. It falls short of the 5 anchor because there is no error-recovery feedback loop (e.g., what to do when `make ci` fails) — a minor validation gap characteristic of the 4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a sub-50-line single-task skill with well-organized sections (## Steps, ## Notes) and no need for external reference files; the only link, the PR template at [.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md](../../../.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md), is a clearly signaled one-level project file the skill must interact with. Per the rubric's simple-skill guideline this merits a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |