CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ce-commit-push-pr

Commit, push, and open a PR. Use when asked to ship/open a PR, or for PR-description-only flows like writing, rewriting, or describing a PR body.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured orchestrator overview that defers mechanics to clearly signaled, one-level-deep references and sequences a multi-step workflow with strong validation checkpoints. The only weakness is minor: a few dense policy passages could be tightened and more execution detail could live inline rather than in references.

Suggestions

Tighten the verbose operational-policy passages (the asking-the-user paragraph and the mode:pipeline modifier description) to lift conciseness toward a 5.

Surface one or two of the most-used executable recipes from the references inline (e.g., the standard `gh pr create` invocation) so the body is actionable without always loading a reference.

Consider spelling out a short inline summary of each reference file's purpose so navigation between the eight references is faster.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense, high-signal, and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic git/PR concepts, but a few operational-policy passages (e.g., the asking-the-user and pipeline-modifier paragraphs) are wordier than they need to be and could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

It gives concrete inline guidance such as "Pass the body via --body-file <path>, never stdin", the banned "git add -A"/"git add .", and a full `gh pr list --head <branch> --state open --json ...` argv, but most executable mechanics are deferred to reference files, leaving minor gaps in the body itself.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1-5 and the four modes are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (re-verify before push/create, exit-code control flow, the publishing gate) and feedback loops (resolve auth then re-check on non-zero exit), satisfying the destructive/batch validation requirement.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview that signals one-level-deep references per step ("Read references/context.md before Step 1", "You MUST read references/pr-description-writing.md"), all of which exist as flat top-level files, giving clear navigation and appropriately split content.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, specific, and explicitly covers both what the skill does and when to use it with natural trigger phrases. It is a strong, low-conflict description with only minor keyword-coverage gaps (missing "pull request"/"submit").

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Commit, push, and open a PR" names three core actions and "writing, rewriting, or describing a PR body" adds three more for the description-only mode, giving multiple concrete actions with comprehensive coverage of the skill's domain.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers what ("Commit, push, and open a PR" plus description-only flows) and when ("Use when asked to ship/open a PR, or for PR-description-only flows like writing, rewriting, or describing a PR body") with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrases like "ship/open a PR" and "writing, rewriting, or describing a PR body" are present with synonyms, but "pull request" is never spelled out and terms like "submit a PR" are absent, leaving a few natural terms missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves a clear PR-shipping and PR-description niche with distinct triggers ("ship/open a PR", "describing a PR body"), keeping conflict risk with adjacent git skills minimal.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.