Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction-only skill body: concise, directive, with clear routing and explicit stop/confirm checkpoints, and a clean two-reference progressive-disclosure split. It stays just below top marks on conciseness, actionability, and workflow clarity because the executable and retry-loop details are deferred to the reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, directive prose with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; every sentence instructs. Not 5 because a few passages (the rendering-rule paragraph, repeated MUST-stop emphasis) could be tightened without losing clarity. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific directives (route the invocation, read the reference first, point-not-reproduce, redact secrets, emit a fenced resume command), with executable shell blocks appropriately deferred to references. Not 5 because the body itself carries no executable code, relying on the references for the runnable pieces. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Both routes are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints ('Creation is complete only after confirming the destination contains the handoff', 'MUST stop and ask the user to select a candidate'). Not 5 because the validate->fix->retry feedback loops live in the references rather than the body. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that points to two real, one-level-deep references (create.md, resume.md), each clearly signaled as a required read, with no nested .md references in the bundle. Matches the clear-overview-with-well-signaled-one-level-deep-references anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |