Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, lean, instruction-only skill that gives concrete generative steps, specified domains, test criteria, and a copy-paste output template. It is strong across all dimensions, consistently scoring 4, with only minor gaps (no regenerate feedback loop, a placeholder Lessons section).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence; guidance like "Familiar vehicle, unfamiliar cargo" and "Structural, not surface" is skill-specific rather than generic padding. A few steps ("Understand the concept") and the empty "Lessons" placeholder are slightly trimmable, keeping it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete 5-step process, three specified analogy domains (physical/tangible, human relationships, common activities), explicit test criteria, and a copy-paste output template. As an instruction-only skill the guidance is actionable, but the actual analogy generation relies on Claude's judgment, leaving minor gaps versus fully copy-paste-ready code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five steps are clearly sequenced and step 5 ("Test each analogy") acts as a validation checkpoint with explicit criteria. It stops short of 5 because there is no explicit regenerate-on-failure feedback loop after the test step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (Purpose, Invocation, How to Generate, Output Format, Principles, What to Avoid) and is self-contained with no need for external references. The empty "Lessons" placeholder and being slightly over the 50-line simple-skill threshold keep it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |