Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, actionable, and concise, with a clear generation workflow and a ready-to-use output template. Its only weak spot is that the body references an external context file that is not present in the bundle.
Suggestions
Resolve the dangling reference to ../../references/context-contract.md: either add the file to a references/ bundle or replace the instruction with inline guidance so the skill is self-contained.
Make the workflow's verification step explicit (e.g., 'Check each option against the Quality Checks before presenting') to push workflow clarity to the top anchor.
Tighten the 'Essential Ingredients' and 'Forms It Might Take' lists, which read as craft background Claude largely already knows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely efficient and assumes craft competence, with only minor over-explanation in the 'What Makes a Promise Work' criteria lists that could be trimmed, sitting just below the lean-and-efficient top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | A concrete 4-step generation process plus an explicit, copy-ready output-format template with placeholders and a 'What to Avoid' checklist gives mostly executable guidance with only minor gaps, matching the 'mostly executable' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'How to Generate' section lays out a clear, ordered sequence (analyze -> select approaches -> generate one per approach -> present all three); this is non-destructive so the validation cap does not apply, though checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single self-contained file with well-organized sections and no bundle files, and at roughly 100 lines of simple single-purpose guidance it meets the simple-skill exception that allows a 5 with clean structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |