Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, concise instruction skill: a classification table, a generalization-decision section, concrete write steps, and a confirm step. It loses points mainly because the confirm step is a report-back rather than an explicit validate-retry loop, and the one referenced file is missing from the bundle.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry loop to the Confirm step (e.g., re-read the destination file to confirm the rule landed correctly and re-revise if it duplicated or overwrote existing guidance) to push workflow_clarity toward 5.
Provide the referenced `../../references/context-contract.md` in the bundle (or inline the essential contract rules) so the single external reference actually resolves.
Tighten the audience-learning paragraph in 'Decide Whether It Should Generalize' — it currently repeats scope/authorization points that could be condensed to one sentence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — it does not explain what VOICE.md or style files are — but a few sentences (e.g. the audience paragraph) could be tightened, fitting the 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' anchor rather than the lean 5-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The classification table maps each learning type to a concrete destination file, and 'Write Precisely' gives five concrete steps (read before editing, narrowest rule, preserve context, record mechanism/consequence, keep examples fresh), which is mostly executable guidance with minor gaps; as an instruction-only skill the absence of code is not penalized, so it is not the lower 3-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is present (Load the Context Contract → Classify → Decide Whether It Should Generalize → Write Precisely → Confirm) with a confirm/verification checkpoint, but the validation is a final reporting step rather than an explicit validate→fix→retry loop, fitting the 'clear sequence with most checkpoints; minor validation gaps' anchor rather than the explicit-feedback-loop 5-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and the single external reference ("Read `../../references/context-contract.md`") is clearly signaled, but that referenced file is not present in the bundle, a minor organization gap that keeps it at the 4-anchor rather than the clean one-level-deep 5-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |