Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-sequenced orchestration skill: it composes four named audits, defines an auditable scoring formula, and includes genuine feedback loops (score-delta re-runs, stated coverage gaps). Weaknesses are the redundancy between the Rules and Workflow sections and references to schema files that are not part of this skill's bundle.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the Rules section against the Workflow steps — rules 2–7 largely restate steps 3–7; keep only the genuinely new ones ("Compose, don't re-implement" and the read/aggregate/dispatch gating rule).
Either bundle the referenced files (specs/finding.schema.json, specs/finding-report.schema.json) or describe their relevant fields inline, since the paths currently dangle outside the skill.
Add one concrete example of invoking a sub-audit or emitting a normalized finding (e.g. a sample finding with class, identity, severity, fixCapability) to make the bus contract executable rather than descriptive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence — no concept explanations, no padding — but most of the Rules section restates Workflow steps (e.g. "The score counts CONFIRMED findings only", "Re-run affected passes… show the score delta"). That duplication is more than a trivial amount, keeping it below the lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete orchestration guidance throughout: named passes with preconditions, an exact scoring formula ("start at 100; subtract per CONFIRMED finding by severity (high −15, med −5, low −1), floor at 0"), a dedup key "(class, identity)", and named fixCapabilities. It falls short of 5 because no concrete invocation syntax is given for the sub-capabilities and the referenced specs/finding.schema.json files are not present in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven explicitly ordered steps with real validation checkpoints and feedback loops: skip-precondition checks announced up front ("a skipped pass is not a pass"), coverage gaps stated rather than dropped, plausible-vs-confirmed separation, and "RE-RUN the affected passes and show the score delta" after fixes. This matches the clear-sequence-with-explicit-validation anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At ~36 lines with well-organized Workflow and Rules sections and no bundle files to disclose, structure is good. It misses 5 because the body cites paths that do not resolve inside the skill bundle (specs/finding.schema.json, specs/finding-report.schema.json, content/capabilities/launch-readiness.json), which muddies navigation. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |