Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable workflow skill with strong verification checkpoints, though it carries noticeable redundancy in the store-selection and required-set explanations that inflates token cost.
Suggestions
Consolidate the store-selection guidance into a single concise rule plus one example instead of restating the --store flag convention multiple times across the paragraph.
Merge the repeated 'required set' explanations in step 4b into one statement to avoid re-explaining the transitive applyRequires closure.
Trim the restated IMPORTANT constraints in the Artifact Creation Guidelines that duplicate rules already stated in the Steps section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of basic-concept padding, but the long store-selection paragraph and the repeated explanations of the 'required set' in step 4b restate the same constraints several times and could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready openspec commands plus the exact JSON fields to parse and explicit decision rules for skipped/blocked artifacts, which is fully actionable for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced steps with verification checkpoints (re-run status after each artifact, verify file existence) and feedback loops for unblocking dependencies; held below 5 by the complexity of the transitive dependency-walking logic. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is self-contained with well-organized sections (Input, Steps, Output, Guidelines, Guardrails), deferring per-artifact detail to the runtime instruction field rather than inlining it. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |