Conciseness

The ~390-line body is padded with README-style sections Claude does not need at invocation time: 'Performance' ('Binary size: 2.4MB', 'Memory: ~50MB'), 'Contributing', 'Credits', 'License', and 'Architecture' crate listings, plus marketing framing like 'Comprehensive TUI/Web dashboard'. This is noticeably verbose with several unnecessary sections rather than only some; it stops short of explaining concepts Claude already knows, so not a 1.

Actionability

Guidance is largely executable and copy-paste ready: '/dashboard', 'cargo install ccboard', 'ccboard web --port 8080', 'ccboard stats', and concrete key bindings ('Press 8', 'e' to edit, '/' to search). Not 5 because of unresolved placeholders ('https://github.com/{OWNER}/ccboard') and reference to a '/ccboard-install' command without pointing to the bundled scripts that implement it.

Workflow Clarity

Install -> launch -> navigate is clearly sequenced, and the Troubleshooting section provides error-recovery loops ('ccboard not found' -> 'which ccboard' -> '/ccboard-install'; MCP 'Unknown' status -> 'ps aux | grep'). The tool is read-only so the destructive-operation validation cap does not apply; not 5 because usage workflows (e.g., MCP troubleshooting) stop at hints rather than explicit verify checkpoints.

Progressive Disclosure

Section headers are good, but the file is a monolithic inline document: the bundle's scripts/ (install-ccboard.sh, check-install.sh) are never referenced from the body, there is no references/ tier, and README-style content (architecture, contributing, credits) that belongs in separate files or out of the skill entirely is inlined. This matches 'some structure but could be better organized' better than anchor 4's 'most content appropriately placed'.

Specificity

The what-clause 'Launch and navigate the ccboard TUI/Web dashboard' plus concrete verbs 'monitoring token usage, tracking costs, browsing sessions, or checking MCP server status' lists several specific actions with only minor coverage gaps. Not 5 because the capability list doubles as the trigger list rather than standing alone; not 3 since well more than 1-2 concrete actions are named.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Launch and navigate the ccboard TUI/Web dashboard for Claude Code') and when ('Use when monitoring token usage, tracking costs, browsing sessions, or checking MCP server status'), matching the anchor-5 pattern of concrete trigger phrases attached to an explicit 'Use when' clause.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrases like 'token usage', 'costs', 'browsing sessions', and 'MCP server status' match what a user would actually say, with good keyword coverage. Not 5 because common synonyms and variations (e.g., 'spending', 'usage statistics', 'activity') are missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (a Claude Code usage dashboard) with distinct triggers tied to that niche; terms like 'ccboard', 'MCP server status', and 'token usage ... across projects' are unlikely to pull in unrelated skills.