Detect, suggest, and evaluate GoF design patterns in TypeScript/JavaScript codebases. Use when refactoring code, applying singleton/factory/observer/strategy patterns, reviewing pattern quality, or finding stack-native alternatives for React, Angular, NestJS, and Vue.
61
73%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./examples/skills/design-patterns/SKILL.mdPurpose: Detect, suggest, and evaluate Gang of Four (GoF) design patterns in TypeScript/JavaScript codebases with stack-aware adaptations.
Trigger: User requests pattern detection or analysis Output: JSON report of patterns found with confidence scores and stack context
Workflow:
1. Stack Detection (package.json, tsconfig.json, framework files)
2. Pattern Search (Glob for candidates -> Grep for signatures -> Read for validation)
3. Classification (native to stack vs custom implementations)
4. Confidence Scoring (0.0-1.0 based on detection rules)
5. JSON Report GenerationExample invocation:
/design-patterns detect src/
/design-patterns analyze --format=jsonTrigger: User requests pattern suggestions or refactoring advice Output: Markdown report with prioritized suggestions and stack-adapted examples
Workflow:
1. Code Smell Detection (switch statements, long parameter lists, global state, etc.)
2. Pattern Matching (map smell -> applicable patterns)
3. Stack Adaptation (prefer native framework patterns over custom implementations)
4. Priority Ranking (impact x feasibility)
5. Markdown Report with Code ExamplesExample invocation:
/design-patterns suggest src/payment/
/design-patterns refactor --focus=creationalTrigger: User requests pattern quality assessment Output: JSON report with scores per evaluation criterion
Workflow:
1. Pattern Identification (which pattern is implemented)
2. Criteria Assessment (correctness, testability, SOLID compliance, documentation)
3. Issue Detection (common mistakes, anti-patterns)
4. Scoring (0-10 per criterion)
5. JSON Report with RecommendationsExample invocation:
/design-patterns evaluate src/services/singleton.ts
/design-patterns quality --pattern=observerSources (in priority order):
package.json -> Check dependencies and devDependenciesangular.json, next.config.*, nest-cli.json, vite.config.*tsconfig.json -> Check compilerOptions, paths, lib*.jsx, *.tsx, *.vue presenceDetection Rules (from signatures/stack-patterns.yaml):
react in deps + *.jsx/*.tsx files@angular/core + angular.json@nestjs/core + nest-cli.jsonvue v3+ + *.vue filesexpress in deps + app.use patternsrxjs in deps + Observable usageredux/zustand in deps + store patternsprisma/typeorm in deps + schema filesOutput:
{
"stack_detected": {
"primary": "react",
"version": "18.2.0",
"secondary": ["typescript", "zustand", "prisma"],
"detection_sources": ["package.json", "tsconfig.json", "37 *.tsx files"],
"confidence": 0.95
}
}Search Strategy:
Glob Phase: Find candidate files by naming convention
*Singleton*.ts, *Factory*.ts, *Strategy*.ts, *Observer*.ts, etc.*Manager*.ts, *Builder*.ts, *Adapter*.ts, *Proxy*.ts, etc.Grep Phase: Search for pattern signatures (from signatures/detection-rules.yaml)
private constructor, static getInstance(), subscribe(), createXxx(), etc.Read Phase: Validate pattern structure
Confidence Scoring:
Classification:
native: Pattern implemented using stack-native features (React Context, Angular Services, NestJS Guards, etc.)custom: Manual TypeScript implementationlibrary: Third-party library providing pattern (RxJS Subject, Redux Store, etc.)Target Smells (from signatures/code-smells.yaml):
Detection Heuristics:
switch (.*type), switch (.*kind), switch (.*mode)function \w+\([^)]{60,}\) (approximation for >4 params)window\., global\., process\.env\.\w+ (not in config files)if.*state.*===.*&&.*if.*state.*===forEach.*notify, map.*\.emit\(Adaptation Logic (from signatures/stack-patterns.yaml):
IF pattern_detected == "custom" AND stack_has_native_equivalent:
SUGGEST: "Use stack-native pattern instead"
PROVIDE: Side-by-side comparison (current vs recommended)
ELSE IF code_smell_detected AND pattern_missing:
IF stack_provides_pattern:
SUGGEST: Stack-native implementation with examples
ELSE:
SUGGEST: Custom TypeScript implementation with best practices
ELSE IF pattern_implemented_incorrectly:
PROVIDE: Refactoring steps to fix anti-patternsExample Adaptations:
| Pattern | Stack | Native Alternative | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Singleton | React | Context API + Provider | Use createContext() instead of getInstance() |
| Observer | Angular | RxJS Subject/BehaviorSubject | Use built-in Observables, not custom implementation |
| Decorator | NestJS | @Injectable() decorators + Interceptors | Use framework interceptors |
| Strategy | Vue 3 | Composition API composables | Use ref() + composables instead of classes |
| Chain of Responsibility | Express | Middleware (app.use()) | Use Express middleware chain |
| Command | Redux | Action creators + reducers | Use Redux actions, not custom command objects |
Criteria (from checklists/pattern-evaluation.md):
Scoring Guidelines:
Issue Detection:
{
"metadata": {
"scan_date": "2026-01-21T10:30:00Z",
"scope": "src/",
"files_scanned": 147,
"execution_time_ms": 2341
},
"stack_detected": {
"primary": "react",
"version": "18.2.0",
"secondary": ["typescript", "zustand", "prisma"],
"detection_sources": ["package.json", "tsconfig.json", "37 *.tsx files"],
"confidence": 0.95
},
"patterns_found": {
"singleton": [
{
"file": "src/lib/api-client.ts",
"lines": "5-28",
"confidence": 0.85,
"type": "custom",
"signals": ["private constructor", "static getInstance", "private static instance"],
"note": "Consider using React Context instead for better testability"
}
],
"observer": [
{
"file": "src/hooks/useAuth.ts",
"lines": "12-45",
"confidence": 0.92,
"type": "native",
"implementation": "React useState + useEffect",
"note": "Correctly using React's built-in observer pattern"
}
],
"factory": [
{
"file": "src/services/notification-factory.ts",
"lines": "8-67",
"confidence": 0.78,
"type": "custom",
"signals": ["createNotification method", "type discrimination", "returns interface"]
}
]
},
"summary": {
"total_patterns": 7,
"native_to_stack": 4,
"custom_implementations": 3,
"by_category": {
"creational": 2,
"structural": 3,
"behavioral": 2
},
"by_confidence": {
"high": 5,
"medium": 2,
"low": 0
}
},
"recommendations": [
"Consider replacing custom Singleton (api-client.ts) with React Context for better DI",
"Review Factory pattern (notification-factory.ts) - could be simplified with strategy pattern"
]
}# Design Pattern Suggestions
**Scope**: `src/payment/`
**Stack**: React 18 + TypeScript + Stripe
**Date**: 2026-01-21
---
## High Priority
### 1. Strategy Pattern: `src/payment/processor.ts:45-89`
**Code Smell**: Switch statement on payment type (4 cases, 78 lines)
**Current Implementation** (lines 52-87):
```typescript
switch (paymentType) {
case 'credit':
// 20 lines of credit card logic
break;
case 'paypal':
// 15 lines of PayPal logic
break;
case 'crypto':
// 18 lines of crypto logic
break;
case 'bank':
// 12 lines of bank transfer logic
break;
}Recommended (React-adapted Strategy):
// Define strategy interface
interface PaymentStrategy {
process: (amount: number) => Promise<PaymentResult>;
}
// Custom hooks as strategies
const useCreditPayment = (): PaymentStrategy => ({
process: async (amount) => { /* credit logic */ }
});
const usePaypalPayment = (): PaymentStrategy => ({
process: async (amount) => { /* PayPal logic */ }
});
// Strategy selection hook
const usePaymentStrategy = (type: PaymentType): PaymentStrategy => {
const strategies = {
credit: useCreditPayment(),
paypal: usePaypalPayment(),
crypto: useCryptoPayment(),
bank: useBankPayment(),
};
return strategies[type];
};
// Usage in component
const PaymentForm = ({ type }: Props) => {
const strategy = usePaymentStrategy(type);
const handlePay = () => strategy.process(amount);
// ...
};Impact:
src/cart/CartManager.ts:23-156Code Smell: Manual notification logic scattered across 8 methods
Current: Manual loops calling update functions Recommended: Use Zustand store (already in dependencies)
// Instead of custom observer:
import create from 'zustand';
interface CartStore {
items: CartItem[];
addItem: (item: CartItem) => void;
removeItem: (id: string) => void;
// Zustand automatically notifies subscribers
}
export const useCartStore = create<CartStore>((set) => ({
items: [],
addItem: (item) => set((state) => ({ items: [...state.items, item] })),
removeItem: (id) => set((state) => ({ items: state.items.filter(i => i.id !== id) })),
}));
// Components auto-subscribe:
const CartDisplay = () => {
const items = useCartStore((state) => state.items);
// Re-renders automatically on cart changes
};Impact:
### Evaluation Mode (JSON)
```json
{
"file": "src/services/config-singleton.ts",
"pattern": "singleton",
"lines": "5-34",
"scores": {
"correctness": 8,
"testability": 4,
"single_responsibility": 9,
"open_closed": 7,
"documentation": 6,
"overall": 6.8
},
"details": {
"correctness": {
"score": 8,
"rationale": "Implements singleton structure correctly with private constructor and static getInstance",
"issues": ["Missing thread-safety consideration (not critical in JS single-threaded context)"]
},
"testability": {
"score": 4,
"rationale": "Hard to mock or reset instance in tests",
"issues": [
"No reset method for test isolation",
"Static instance makes dependency injection impossible",
"Tests must run in specific order or share state"
],
"suggestions": [
"Add resetInstance() method for tests (with appropriate guards)",
"Consider using dependency injection instead"
]
},
"single_responsibility": {
"score": 9,
"rationale": "Focuses solely on configuration management",
"issues": []
},
"open_closed": {
"score": 7,
"rationale": "Configuration can be extended but requires modification for new sources",
"suggestions": ["Consider strategy pattern for configuration sources"]
},
"documentation": {
"score": 6,
"rationale": "Has JSDoc but missing rationale for singleton choice",
"suggestions": ["Document why singleton is chosen over DI", "Add usage examples"]
}
},
"recommendations": [
{
"priority": "high",
"suggestion": "Add test-friendly reset mechanism or refactor to use DI",
"rationale": "Current implementation makes testing difficult"
},
{
"priority": "medium",
"suggestion": "Document singleton rationale in JSDoc",
"rationale": "Team members should understand why global state is necessary here"
}
]
}.ts, .tsx).js, .jsx)--scope to limit scan to specific directories# Detect all patterns in src/
/design-patterns detect src/
# Detect only creational patterns
/design-patterns detect src/ --category=creational
# Focus on specific pattern
/design-patterns detect src/ --pattern=singleton# Get suggestions for payment module
/design-patterns suggest src/payment/
# Focus on specific smell
/design-patterns suggest src/ --smell=switch-on-type
# High priority only
/design-patterns suggest src/ --priority=high# Evaluate specific file
/design-patterns evaluate src/services/api-client.ts
# Evaluate all singletons
/design-patterns evaluate src/ --pattern=singleton
# Full quality report
/design-patterns evaluate src/ --detailedThis skill can be inherited by:
refactoring-specialist.md: Provides pattern knowledge for refactoringcode-reviewer.md: Adds pattern detection to review processarchitecture-advisor.md: Informs architectural decisions with pattern usagereference/patterns-index.yaml: Machine-readable index of 23 patterns with metadatareference/creational.md: Creational patterns documentationreference/structural.md: Structural patterns documentationreference/behavioral.md: Behavioral patterns documentationsignatures/detection-rules.yaml: Regex patterns and heuristics for detectionsignatures/code-smells.yaml: Mapping from code smells to applicable patternssignatures/stack-patterns.yaml: Stack detection rules and native pattern equivalentschecklists/pattern-evaluation.md: Quality evaluation criteria and scoring guidelinesSkill Version: 1.0.0 Pattern Coverage: 23 GoF patterns Supported Stacks: 8 (React, Angular, NestJS, Vue, Express, RxJS, Redux/Zustand, ORMs) Last Updated: 2026-01-21
752edfe
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.