CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

eval-agents

Audit custom subagent definitions for Claude Code (.claude/agents/*.md) and Codex (.codex/agents/*.toml): loadability against the native schema, description overlap, model tier, tool scope, and headless-safe instructions. Use when onboarding to a project with agents, after adding or importing agents, or when the parent agent delegates to the wrong agent.

72

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, well-sequenced audit workflow with almost no filler — the scoring rubric, report template, and per-step exit criteria are exemplary. The main weakness is structure: the skill is a single monolithic file whose host-reference material inflates token cost on every load instead of being split into one-level-deep reference files.

Suggestions

Move the Host reference section (Claude Code load precedence, silent-skip rules, frontmatter field table, model resolution, and the Codex schema table) into separate reference files such as references/claude-code-agents.md and references/codex-agents.md, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview that links to them.

Deduplicate the `claude plugin validate` guidance (currently stated in both the Host reference and Step 2) — state it once and cross-reference it.

The model tier signal table and pricing figures are lookup material consulted only during scoring; move them next to the scoring criteria or into a reference file so Steps 1-6 read as a lean runbook.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and table-driven with almost no padding — nearly every line is host-specific runtime fact Claude cannot reliably know. Minor redundancy keeps it below a 5: the `claude plugin validate` advice ("v2.1.233 or later") and the strict-YAML portability warning each appear in both the Host reference and Step 2.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: copy-paste discovery commands (`find -L .claude/agents -name "*.md"`), a point-by-point scoring rubric with per-criterion point values, a complete report template, concrete edge cases with fixes, and per-step "Done when" exit criteria.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1-6 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (loadability via `claude plugin validate`, collision checks, "Done when" gates per step), a triage mode for >20 agents, and an explicit confirmation gate before file deletion — so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist; the ~90-line Host reference (load precedence, silent-skip rules, the full frontmatter field table, Codex schema) is inline lookup material that loads on every invocation and clearly belongs in separate reference files (e.g., references/claude-code.md, references/codex.md). Section headers give it structure, but content that should be separate is inlined.

3 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: specific, third-person, with explicit what/when structure and concrete trigger scenarios. The only gap is modest keyword coverage of common phrasings users might naturally use to invoke an agent audit.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates five concrete check dimensions ("loadability against the native schema, description overlap, model tier, tool scope, and headless-safe instructions") with explicit file paths for both hosts, giving comprehensive coverage of what the skill audits.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ("Audit custom subagent definitions ... loadability ... description overlap, model tier, tool scope, and headless-safe instructions") and when ("Use when onboarding to a project with agents, after adding or importing agents, or when the parent agent delegates to the wrong agent") with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural triggers like "onboarding to a project with agents", "after adding or importing agents", and "delegates to the wrong agent" are present alongside file extensions, but common synonyms users might say ("check my agents", "agent hygiene", "review agents") are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is narrow and clearly bounded — custom subagent definition files for two named hosts with explicit paths — and the trigger scenarios (wrong delegation, agent import) are distinct from generic evaluation skills, so conflict risk is minimal.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide

Path

examples/skills/eval-agents/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.