Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable, lean skill body with a clear multi-step workflow and validation gate. The only weakness is progressive disclosure: two referenced example files are missing from the bundle, leaving dangling links.
Suggestions
Create the referenced examples/version-output.md and examples/week-output.md (or remove the two examples/ entries from both the Step 7 illustration and the 'Reference Files' list) so all cited paths resolve.
Ensure the 'Reference Files' list only enumerates files that actually exist in the bundle to keep navigation trustworthy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and table-driven, assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of what a CHANGELOG or library is), and every section earns its place; the placeholder output block is a justified format spec rather than padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete invocations ('/guide-recap latest', '/guide-recap week 2026-01-27'), a fully specified scoring formula, explicit flag and error-handling tables, and exact reference file paths — copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven steps are clearly sequenced with an explicit validation gate (Step 5: 'If all scores < 3 ... and exit unless --force') and error-recovery suggestions (list last 5 versions, suggest latest), matching the clear-sequence-with-checkpoints anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Overview sits in SKILL.md with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to references/ and assets/, but the body and 'Reference Files' section cite examples/version-output.md and examples/week-output.md which do not exist — broken navigation paths prevent a clean top score. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |