Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, actionable, and well-structured for a simple single-action MCP-tool skill, with a clear success-reporting checkpoint. The main gap is the absence of an explicit failure-recovery loop and an example tool invocation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — concrete facts (size, timing, cache path) each earn their place with no padding or explanation of known concepts. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It names the exact MCP tool to invoke and its effects, plus explicit post-success reporting steps, but lacks an example invocation or parameter detail, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action is unambiguous with a post-success checkpoint (report sections found and snapshot path), but no error-recovery/feedback loop is specified, a minor validation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed and well-organized sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |