CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

source-command-changelog

View recent CHANGELOG entries

52

Quality

58%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.agents/skills/source-command-changelog/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and actionable, giving Claude a concrete regex, clear steps, and edge-case handling for a simple read-only task. The main weakness is verbosity in the inlined output-format template, which could be condensed.

Suggestions

Condense the output-format example: replace the long ASCII separator lines and full sample entries with a compact skeleton showing the structure.

Add an explicit guard for a missing CHANGELOG.md (e.g., report that no changelog was found) to close the minor validation gap.

Note how to count total entries for the footer (e.g., 'N = number of parsed version headers') so the footer step is unambiguous.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

It does not over-explain concepts Claude already knows, but the long ASCII-separator output template block (lines 34-72) with full sample entries is padding that could be tightened, matching 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides a concrete parse regex, runnable usage examples, a 6-step implementation, and explicit edge-case handling; mostly executable with only minor gaps, so anchor 4 fits rather than the fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear, ordered 6-step sequence with robustness notes (skip Unreleased, handle missing dates); this is a read-only display skill so the destructive/batch cap-3 does not apply, but there are minor validation gaps versus the explicit checkpoints of anchor 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files are needed; the body is self-contained with well-organized sections and easy navigation, but at ~85 lines with a heavy inlined output template it sits at 'good structure, minor organization gaps' rather than the lean anchor-5 case.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and names a clear niche (viewing CHANGELOG entries) but is too thin: a single minimal action and no explicit 'when to use' guidance. Adding a Use-when clause and one or two more concrete actions would lift specificity and completeness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks to see recent changelog entries, release notes, or version history.'

Name an additional concrete action beyond 'View', such as 'View and summarize recent CHANGELOG entries by version, date, and changed sections.'

Include a natural synonym/file reference like 'CHANGELOG.md' or 'release notes' to broaden trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('CHANGELOG entries') but offers only one minimal action ('View'); anchor 2 ('Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic') fits, and it lacks the 1-2 concrete actions required for a 3.

2 / 5

Completeness

It has a clear 'what' ('View recent CHANGELOG entries') but no 'when'/use-when clause; per the judging guidelines a missing explicit trigger caps completeness at 3, fitting anchor 3 exactly.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'CHANGELOG', 'recent', and 'entries' are relevant natural keywords a user might say, but the description misses common variations, synonyms, and file extensions, matching anchor 3 rather than the comprehensive coverage of 4.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'CHANGELOG entries' is a clear niche with low conflict risk, but the absence of explicit trigger phrases (present in the anchor-5 example) keeps it at 'mostly distinct' rather than a 5.

4 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.