talk-stage3-concepts
Builds a numbered, categorized concept catalogue from the talk summary and timeline, scoring each concept HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW for talk potential with optional repo enrichment. Use when you need a structured inventory of concepts before choosing a talk angle, or when assessing which ideas have the strongest presentation potential.
68
85%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
85%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted description that clearly defines a specific capability (building scored concept catalogues for talk preparation) and includes explicit 'Use when' guidance. Its main weakness is that trigger terms lean toward domain-specific language rather than the natural phrases users might employ when they need this skill. The description uses proper third-person voice and avoids vague language.
Suggestions
Add more natural trigger terms users might say, such as 'brainstorm talk topics', 'rank presentation ideas', or 'what should I present about'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: builds a numbered/categorized concept catalogue, scores concepts HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW for talk potential, and includes optional repo enrichment. These are concrete, well-defined actions. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Builds a numbered, categorized concept catalogue...scoring each concept HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW') and when ('Use when you need a structured inventory of concepts before choosing a talk angle, or when assessing which ideas have the strongest presentation potential'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant terms like 'concept catalogue', 'talk potential', 'presentation potential', 'talk angle', and 'structured inventory', but these are somewhat specialized. Users might more naturally say things like 'brainstorm topics', 'rank ideas', or 'pick a talk topic' which aren't covered. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche: concept cataloguing for talk/presentation preparation with scoring. This is unlikely to conflict with other skills due to its narrow, well-defined scope combining concept inventory with talk potential assessment. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong skill that provides highly actionable guidance with concrete output templates, well-defined scoring criteria, and a clear validation checklist. The workflow is well-sequenced with appropriate checkpoints. Minor verbosity in the introductory sections and some redundancy between the 'What This Skill Does' list and the actual detailed sections slightly reduce token efficiency, but overall the content is well-crafted.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably well-structured but includes some unnecessary explanation (e.g., 'What This Skill Does' largely repeats what's obvious from the output format). The scoring criteria descriptions and category table are useful reference material, but the tips section and some workflow narration could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides a fully concrete output format with exact markdown templates, specific scoring criteria with clear anchors, a complete category table, a validation checklist with numeric thresholds, and anti-patterns. Claude has everything needed to produce the expected output without ambiguity. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step process is clearly sequenced (read summary → read timeline → extract → categorize → score → optional enrichment → write). The validation checklist provides explicit checkpoints (minimum 15 concepts, score calibration, correct file paths). The scoring discipline constraint ('Max 30% HIGH') acts as a built-in validation gate. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is well-organized with clear sections progressing from when/what to inputs/outputs to detailed criteria to output format. Related skills are linked with one-level-deep references and clear descriptions of their relationship. No bundle files are needed for this instruction-focused skill, and the content length is appropriate for inline presentation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
60a4372
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.