Stage 4 — Strategic angles, titles, descriptions, peer feedback draft. Includes mandatory CHECKPOINT before script can start.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide --skill talk-stage4-positionGenerates strategic angles, titles, descriptions, and a peer-feedback draft. Then stops and waits for your angle + title choice before Stage 5 can proceed.
talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-summary.md (required)talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-concepts.md (required)talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-angles.mdtalks/{YYYY}-{slug}-titre.mdtalks/{YYYY}-{slug}-descriptions.mdtalks/{YYYY}-{slug}-feedback-draft.md# Talk Angles — {provisional title}
**Goal**: Choose the angle that maximizes impact for {audience}.
**Audience**: {audience description}
---
## Angle 1: {Angle name}
**Pitch**: {2-3 sentences describing the talk from this angle}
**Strengths**:
- {strength 1}
- {strength 2}
**Weaknesses**:
- {weakness 1}
- {weakness 2}
**Audience fit**: Strong / Medium / Weak — {short justification}
**Verdict**: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (out of 5)
---
[Angle 2, Angle 3, (optional Angle 4) — same structure]
---
## Recommendation: Angle {X}, enriched by the others
**Angle {X} is the right choice.** Here's why:
### 1. It's the only angle that integrates the others
[Structure showing how other angles feed into the main one]
### 2. The narrative arc is natural and compelling
[Why the story holds better with this angle]
### 3. The metrics lend credibility throughout
[Which metrics support this angle most]
### 4. The final message emerges naturally
[How the conclusion flows from this angle]
---
## Recommended structure with sub-angles
| Act | Duration | Main angle | Integrated sub-angle |
|-----|----------|-----------|---------------------|
| 1. {name} | {n} min | {main angle} | {sub-angle} |
...# Titles — Talk {slug}
**Selected angle**: Angle {X} — {name}
**Constraints**: {duration} min | {audience}
---
## Titles for the recommended angle
### Option 1 (recommended)
**{Main title}**
*Optional subtitle: {subtitle}*
Strengths: {why this title works}
Audience appeal: {who it hooks}
### Option 2
**{Title}**
Strengths: {strengths}
[Options 3-5]
---
## Titles for alternative angles (backup)
### If Angle 2 chosen
- **{title}**
- **{title}**
[If Angle 3 chosen — same]
---
## Verdict
**Recommendation**: Option 1 — "{title}"
**Why**: {short justification}# Descriptions — Talk {slug}
---
## Short description (abstract, ~100 words)
{Full text — direct, engaging, starts with the impact or concrete promise.
Not "In this talk, we will..."}
---
## Long description (CFP, ~250 words)
{Full text — context, what the audience will learn, who it's for.
Includes key metrics if available.
Direct and factual tone.}
---
## Speaker pitch (bio-ready, ~50 words)
{Speaker introduction in 1-2 sentences, their relationship to the topic}
---
## Tags / Keywords
{5-10 relevant tags for CFP or search}After generating and saving the 4 files, display:
---
CHECKPOINT: Angle + Title choice
I've generated 4 files:
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-angles.md → {n} angles analyzed
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-titre.md → {n} title options
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-descriptions.md
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-feedback-draft.md
Before starting the script (Stage 5), I need your choice:
1. Which angle do you choose? (recommended: Angle {X} — {name})
2. Which title do you prefer? (recommended: "{title}")
You can also modify, combine, or propose something different.
Reply to start the script.
---Do not invoke Stage 5 without explicit user confirmation.
feedback-draft.md to a peer before the checkpoint — 10 minutes of external feedback can save hours of rework on the scripttemplates/feedback-draft.md352e748
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.