Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An efficient, well-organized decision skill that gives concrete prioritization and skip guidance plus a clear gating rule. The main improvement opportunity is adding a brief worked example to make the decision more tangible.
Suggestions
Add a short worked example showing the decision applied to one realistic change (e.g., a refactor vs. a new persisted-state path) to lift actionability toward fully concrete coverage.
Consider a one-line checkpoint framing (e.g., 'State the failure mode out loud; if you cannot name it, skip the test') to make the existing gate read more explicitly as a validation step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~7-line body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and never restates concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, actionable guidance is given via explicit prioritize/skip lists and a clear gating rule, but no worked examples illustrate the decision on a realistic change, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear single-step decision flow with an explicit gate ("If that case is weak, do not add one") is present, but it is a gating criterion rather than a multi-step workflow with feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and well-organized sections (heading, prioritization/skip lists, gating paragraph), meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |